Today, I'm going to write I have thought with read a book.
The book shows certain bug that pretend to be dead.
This book begins a scientist who has been curious about bug's pretend to be dead.
When he had interested in this bug's action, the action still hadn't been researched in earnest at that time.
If nobody had researched, it seemed that he decided to research.
Naturally, he didn't know a way to research about it. His research started from such a place.
He has some partners that he is teaching at college.
They have struggled to work out questions about the action.
And whenever they discovered something to answer, they confronted another question.
At such time, someone's utterly different research helps them.
And they have reached a new answer.
At a glance, various research has nothing to do with his research will help to answer.
Arising those relations is attracted me.
At the same time, I think it will not work well that Japanese government selects a proper field to attempt to allocate a budget for research.
Human beings cannot estimate which research will be helpful.
Incidentally, I'm going to introduce my interpretation of a bug pretending to be dead.
The bug's motion ability isn't the same for each of them.
An individual inferior in motion ability when they will encounter a predator was eaten by them easily.
They weren't just eaten, they would take various ways to escape the predator.
While those situations would be repeated more than once, some way that works better has been leaving in them.
It becomes the pretense of death.
